Vimgo P10 Extremely-Price range Pico Projector: Not Unhealthy for $250-ish


The Vimgo P10 is without doubt one of the seemingly numerous projectors on Amazon I’ll christen as “extremely price range.” Its worth varies between $200 and $250, much like the AAXA P8, the most affordable projector we have reviewed so far. To reply the obvious query up entrance: Sure, the Vimgo P10 does really work. 

I used to be all prepared with a protracted checklist of hilarious comparisons to explain how dangerous the Vimgo P10 was. In any case, how good can a projector that prices lower than a pair of good headphones actually be? The reply is, to my shock, not dangerous. Not good, definitely, however contemplating the low worth, it is comparatively vivid, has a powerful distinction ratio, and even has Netflix inbuilt, though there is not any built-in battery.


  • The value
  • Fashionable design
  • Surprisingly good distinction and brightness

Do not Like

  • Wonky shade
  • A wide range of small image points
  • No upward throw

So must you commerce in your Sony 325ES to get this gorgeous achievement in video projection? Completely not. Nonetheless, you could be stunned to learn the way far the low finish of the projector market has come.

Look to the lens

  • Native decision: 1,920×1,080 pixels
  • HDR-compatible: No
  • 4K-compatible: Sure
  • 3D-compatible: No
  • Lumens spec: 300
  • Zoom: No
  • Lens shift: No
  • LED life: 30,000 hours

Lots of the P10’s greatest points, and one energy, stem from its weird lens. It is by far the best — and for the class, largest — lens I’ve seen on a projector like this. Sometimes, giant lenses are factor, as they let extra mild move via. With cameras, a giant lens affords quite a lot of image-quality advantages. With a projector there are related advantages, however there are additionally quite a lot of tradeoffs. With out going too far into the weeds for lens design, I am going to simply say that the P10’s irregular lens provides it surprisingly good brightness and distinction, seemingly at the price of uniformity and general sharpness. The P10 is 1080p decision, which is uncommon amongst low-cost projectors, however its sharpness and element endure fairly a bit towards the sides of the picture.

A closeup of the large lens of the Vimgo P10.

Geoff Morrison/CNET

One other bizarre factor: There is no upwards throw. Projectors are normally designed to mission a picture with a decrease edge that is at or above the highest of the projector itself, so you possibly can place the projector on a espresso desk, or mount it on the ceiling upside-down, and mission the picture roughly in the course of a wall. The P10 initiatives straight forward. This is not exceptional — the high-end Epson 5050LS11000, and Sony 325ES do that, as an example. However what these projectors have, the P10 doesn’t: zoom. With no zoom, the P10 creates a 100-inch picture when positioned roughly 9 ft from the display, proper the place you are most likely sitting, after which must be about 4 ft off the bottom. So roughly at eye stage. 

Now playing:
Watch this:

How to buy the best home theater projector


I recommend using a tripod with the P10 rather than trying to stack books or boxes on a table to get it high enough. That, or you have to create a smaller image than perhaps you’d want by placing it closer to the screen and watching from behind. Yes, you could use keystone adjustment, but you absolutely shouldn’t.

The P10 is, surprisingly, relatively bright. Vimgo claims 300 lumens, and I measured 271, which is not only one of the closest claimed-to-measured amounts I’ve tested, but also roughly the same as the AAXA P8 and even the far more expensive Xgimi Halo Plus. The simplicity of the lens also seems to lend itself to a solid contrast ratio. I measured a flat-out impressive 1907:1, which is technically better than the $4,000 Epson LS11000. Hold your applause, however; that’s not the whole story.

Inputs, too

The inputs of the Vimgo P10 projector.

Geoff Morrison/CNET
  • HDMI inputs: 1
  • USB port: 1
  • Audio output: Headphone output/Bluetooth
  • Internet: 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Remote: Not backlit

The P10’s inputs are pretty traditional — HDMI, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth. Despite the design implying there are big speakers on either side, there aren’t. Instead there’s two tiny 5W speakers on the back. They sound better than a lot of tiny, cheap projector speakers though — a bit boomy at max volume, but I’ve heard worse.

There are some streaming services built in, like Netflix, Paramount Plus, Disney Plus, YouTube, Hulu and Prime Video. There’s no HBO Max or Vudu. These are often the mobile versions of these apps, so for instance you can’t cast Netflix from your phone to the P10 because Netflix thinks of the P10 as a source, not a display. Likewise, it’s a pain to navigate using a remote. It does work, though, so there’s that.

And whatever you do, don’t lose the remote because the only button on the projector itself is power. Without the clicker you won’t be able to be able to navigate the menus or focus the image. This P10’s digital focus adjustment isn’t automatic like most small projectors.

Picture comparisons

The pale blue side of the Vimgo P10 projector on a green background.

Geoff Morrison/CNET

I compared the Vimgo P10 to the AAXA P8 and the Anker Nebula Mars II Pro. The AAXA P8 is as close in price to the Vimgo as any projector we’ve reviewed. The P8 is significantly smaller, however. Closer in size to the Vimgo is the Anker Mars II Pro, which is also roughly twice as expensive. It’s our go-to pick for a portable projector though, and unlike the other two it has a built-in battery. I connected all three to a Monoprice 1×4 distribution amplifier and viewed them side-by-side-by-side on a 102-inch 1.0-gain screen.

All three are in the same ballpark, brightness-wise. They can create a 100-inch image, but they look far more comfortable creating something in the 50-inch range. 

Image sharpness is a bigger differentiator. The AAXA is only 960×540, and it shows with big chunky pixels. The Mars II Pro is 720p, so it looks sharper. The Vimgo is 1080p, and despite some issues with its lens, it looks the sharpest — by a little bit anyway. As long as the subject of the shot is in the center of the frame, there’s lots of detail. The sides of the image, however, don’t look nearly as sharp — an issue I blame on that lens. If you don’t adjust the picture settings some of this apparent sharpness is due to some extremely heavy-handed edge enhancement, which is why the Vimgo, like most displays, looks better if you turn the sharpness control down

Contrast ratio is the Vimgo’s biggest strength, and if you’re a projector and you only have one stat to choose as your best performer, contrast ratio is the one to pick. It’s like designing a race car and deciding early on, “You know what would make this car really good? If we made it fast.” Compared to the other two, the Vimgo looks significantly less washed-out with more apparent depth, and it’s not subtle. We’re talking LCD vs. OLED TV levels of difference here. I’m not sure how Vimgo is pulling this off, but my guess is that weird, simple lens.

The small remote of the Vimgo P10.

Geoff Morrison/CNET

With strong contrast comes plenty of weaknesses. The P10’s brightness uniformity is abysmal, again likely due to the simple lens. The center of the screen is noticeably brighter than the edges, as if someone had cranked up the “vignette” control to stylistically darken the corners. The P10 also has the worst color of any display I’ve tested in over two decades of doing so. Reds are practically pastel pink, blues are somewhat teal, greens are pale and yellowish.

Even so, with that great contrast ratio and decent brightness the Vimgo should be the easy winner among the three, but it’s not. It’s better than the AAXA, sure. Both have terrible color accuracy, but differently terrible, if you can believe it. So if you don’t need something that can fit in the palm of your hand, the image from the Vimgo is better. 

But the Anker Nebula Mars just looks so much more natural, its color so much more accurate. I mean, even slightly based in reality is an improvement compared to the Vimgo, and the Mars II Pro goes beyond that. So yeah, the Anker is overall better than either the AAXA or the Vimgo.

The Mars II Pro is not as detailed, more expensive, and has just a fraction of the contrast ratio, but it just has a more pleasing overall image. This is why it has done so well compared to so many other portable projectors, despite its own issues. It’s two and a half times the price of the Vimgo, however, so one would hope it’s better. 

What about the Anker Nebula Capsule? At $300, the Capsule is certainly a lot closer in price to the P10 than the Mars II Pro. However, with a measured 85 lumens, it would look exceptionally dim in comparison. It’s a good projector, for its tiny size and price, however. Along the same lines, the AAXA P6X is $360, but significantly brighter than any of these, and like the Capsule it has a built-in battery.

Bottom line: Can’t beat the price

A view from the front of the large lens of the Vimgo P10 projector on a green background.

Geoff Morrison/CNET

Honestly, I don’t know what to make of the Vimgo P10. The image it creates is, in many ways, pretty bad. I feel like I could crush it to dust if I squeezed too hard. The lens and overall design look like a pastel HAL 9000. I want to trash it completely, but I’m sorry, Dave, I’m afraid I can’t do that. Because, surprisingly, the image it creates is perfectly watchable, especially when you consider how little it costs. If you can afford better, should you get something else? Yes, for sure. But I’ve seen far worse for more money.

So as long as you keep in mind that this is an ultra-budget projector, one of the cheapest products in a category that includes models that are $50,000-plus, it’s a steal. I wouldn’t consider it as a TV replacement, but for something to have on hand for the occasional big-screen viewing party, it’s an easy, inexpensive choice.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here